Reich Radcliffe and Hoover has a strong history of successful oral arguments in Courts of Appeal. 

Ayotte v. Woodson

In Ayotte v. Woodson Richard Radcliffe successfully argued in front of the Fourth District, Division Three Court of Appeal that the Court should affirm an order to sustain a demurrer to a probate petition without leave to amend on the grounds of laches. This was effectively a reversal of the trial court, which denied on the alternative grounds of the statute of limitations.

Vulcan Lands v. Currie

In Vulcan Lands v. Currie Marc Reich persuasively argued in front of the Fourth District, Division Two Court of Appeal about the correct way to interpret ambiguities in a contract for mineral rights by excellently utilizing the facts of the case.